Plugins are used in data applications to support more than one provider from a single codebase.  The Provider Factories in ADO.Net is one such example, but you cannot work with the provider specific features when you use these factories since they only implement generic ADO.Net functions.  If you need to be able to use provider specific functions (like VistaDB’s DDA Pack routines), you have to load the provider somehow.  In most cases you put that logic and bindings into a separate assembly and load it when that ability is needed.  By taking this approach a little further and building interfaces you can abstract your logic to support more than one database provider using this model.

In this article I will explain more of how to code works to use VistaDB in a plug-in model previously explained in building a plug in model for VistaDB - Part 1. The application used to demonstrate the plug-in model is a simple windows form that allows users to deposit, withdrawal or check the balance of an account that is stored in either a VistaDB or Sql Server database.

We will implement the VistaDB custom plugins in this example.  You could implement other plugins for any other database you wish to support through the same interface.  In each case these plugins are hard bound against the database provider, but the actual application has NO binding to the database directly.  This is to allow it to run on machines where the database provider has not been installed.

Factory Classes in Main Application

The following classes are all contained within the applications main assembly.

Plug-in Factory

The plug-in factory is an abstract class that each custom plugin will need to inherit from to load from the singleton factory.

public abstract class PluginFactory
{
    #region public members
    public abstract BankModel.Provider ProviderName { get; }
    #endregion

    #region public methods
    public abstract BankModel GetModel(string connectionString);
    #endregion
}

ProviderName will return the name of BankModel provider, VistaDB or SqlServer. The GetModel method takes a database connection string and returns the abstract BankModel for that provider.

More...

In this article I will explain how to build an application that uses VistaDB and Microsoft’s SQL Server, without being hard bound against their providers directly.

Many companies desire to offer the choice from several database providers in a single product or API.  In many cases if you were directly bound, but the provider not installed, you would get a dll not found exception at startup. 

There are two ways to handle this scenario.  The most common method is to use ADO.Net Provider Factories and load the provider dynamically at runtime.  We have covered this in other blog posts.  This works great if you don’t need to use any DDA code, or any other provider specific functions.  But it is not really possible if you want to use provider level abilities.

The alternative is to put the provider specific code in an external dll, and load the code as a part of a plugin model.  Plugins can then be loaded individually and removed from consideration if the assembly fails to load (like when the provider is not actually present).  This allows for your code to continue to run, within needing the main executable to be bound against the provider.

More...

NOTE: This article was originally published on the VistaDB blog, but has been moved to this location permanently.

Each of these items could be a blog post unto themselves, but I am going to try really hard to not be too verbose and just cover the core of the concept and why you need to do it.

Data driven applications rely on their databases

Everyone knows that any app driven by data is much more than just the app.  In most cases the app without a database doesn’t even function, or fails to function properly.  If a database is an integral part of your application, then shouldn’t you be doing all you can to ensure it stays healthy and prepare for the worst case events of corruption or dead drives?

This week we have been contacted by 5 long time users who suddenly lost or corrupted their data.  Two of these were end user data that is going to cost a huge amount of labor to reproduce.  In all of these cases the following simple procedures would have prevented the situation entirely.

More...